Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

India Turns to Community Computing

0 comments
Summary

Technology Review magazine interviewed Kenneth Keniston, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of Human Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Keniston, who serves as director of MIT's India Program, is interested in the proliferation of community information centers in India - kiosks where villagers can pay a small fee to access land records, market prices, and other information. A few programmes seem to have had success, despite language interface barriers. ISCII (Indian Standard Code for Information Interchange), he says, is not widely used. However, advocacy organisations have worked to create Indian language interfaces. Examples of initiatives that seem to have really taken off include Gyandoot, the Bhoomi land records project, and Drishtee's Community Information Centers.


However, Keniston says that evaluation of whether these programmes have in fact had an impact on communities - and what might help them flourish over time - has not yet been done in any sustained fashion. First, systems in rural areas often break down - organisers may be more focussed on keeping the centre running than evaluating its sustainability. (Beyond that, "there are projects that have a low impact, and therefore there is no motivation to do impact studies", he claims). Second, there are many competing priorities in high-poverty areas. He cites a personal experience of visiting an extremely poor village that was supposed to have a kiosk, but did not. Though hunger was a central issue, "The women were very articulate. What stood out was their determination to ensure that the next generation could read and write".


Nonetheless, Keniston urges, studies are essential: "We need to know what works and what doesn't work. It is not a philosophical question. It is a question of knowing the facts. Such studies have to be done by Indians themselves and not by people like me who don't speak the local language."


There should be two aspects to such a study, Keniston says: impact and sustainability. To study the impact, he says, a researcher needs to actually live in the villages, talking to a broad range of community members. In addition, hard questions must be asked about the expenses associated with building, maintaining, and sustaining the infrastructure. He adds that possible sources of revenue, like paying kiosk operators to teach village children how to use computers, should be explored.


Click here to access the full article on the MIT Technology Review site (a free, one-time registration is required.

Source

Benton News.