Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Onward Sweep of Social Capital: Causes and Consequences for Understanding Cities, Communities and Urban Movements (The)

0 comments
Affiliation
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Summary

This article examines how 'social capital' is used by researchers and practitioners in the field of urban movements and community development. It also explores the gaps and weaknesses that occur when examining the 'social capital' perspective.

Mayer describes social capital in this way: "attaching the adjective 'social' to the economic term 'capital' suggests that, next to 'non-social' forms of capital (such as finance capital, material, physical capital or human capital), there exists a social variant of capital, which shares with other forms of capital the capacity to grow through utilization." She also contends that whether it is intended or not, when associated activities and civil resources are labelled as a form of capital "they appear as economic behaviour assets - a language effect, which... influences the way the emerging discourse perceives associational activity."

Mayer describes a signficant change in the development of urban movements. Politicians, urban scholars and activists in urban development now refer to the importance of grassroots empowerment and citizen participation for dealing with urban problems which "incorporate and harness community-based interests and local activism."

The social capital perspective at its core, according to Mayer, "argues that both the quality of democratic politics and the vitality of a region's economic life depend on the degree to which its people enjoy social capital." She further postulates that the goal of "the accumulation" of social capital is "not economic security for the poor or the reduction of inequality, but 'empowerment' and 'inclusion'".

Mayer suggests that communities, neighborhoods, women, workers and the unemployed must empower themselves and put pressure on urban administrators, to develop their social capital. The result according to Mayer is that urban poverty - which tacitly became constructed as the product of ineffective local governance and of underdeveloped social capital - can be alleviated."