Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Who Rules the Internet?

0 comments
Affiliation
Panos Media Toolkit on ICTs – No.1
Summary

This 6-page briefing document is the first in a series of media toolkits designed for journalists who seek information on Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and the 'information society'. It is intended for non-specialists, and in particular to journalists who cover information society issues around the second stage of the World Summit on the Information Society (November 2005). This paper describes Internet governance as "becoming an influential factor in the way we access, consume, produce and exchange our information within and among nations."

According to this paper, in 2003, at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in Geneva, the issue of Internet governance was the subject of "heated" debate. The Internet has no single governance system and was originated from the
private sector. At the WSIS meeting, concern was expressed that the internet is controlled by commercial interests and is not a resource that is available to everyone. There was debate over the need for control of content vs. limiting freedom of expression. Should pornography, hate-content, crime be controlled by governments?

Part of the debate centered around whether or not governments should be given more power over the Internet and if so would this constrain growth and limit users’ freedom. If so, then the paper suggests that Internet governance would need to be brought under an intergovernmental body, possibly within the United Nations umbrella.

ICANN (the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers) is the non-profit organisation that presently oversees the system of Internet addresses and is based in the United States. According to the paper there is a general perception that ICANN is not a representative organisation in part because the ultimate power is held by the United States government. Many hope that Internet governance will be an open system that will be international as well as equitable. At first few governments took interest in the development of the Internet, but over time interest has grown and many governments wish to manage their domain names themselves. The paper also alluded to the fact that Generic Domain Names are based on English words and that it is a major undertaking to change language script characters.

In November 2005 at the WSIS meeting in Tunis, a working group will report to the UN Secretary General with recommendations as to how to move these complex issues and considerations forward.

Source

Message sent to Bytesforall Readers Listserve on February 15, 2005.