Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Safe Environment for Children, A: Qualitative and Quantitative Findings

0 comments
SummaryText
Section 319 (1) of the Communications Act 2003 in the United Kingdom requires the Office of Communications (Ofcom) to set a Code which contains standards for the content of television and radio services. This document presents research that aims to assist in the consideration of points raised by a public consultation on the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. Previous research had identified concern from viewers about the extent to which television was providing a safe viewing environment for children. In addition, there was wider viewer concern about the suitability of some pre-watershed content for children. This research explores attitudes to pre-watershed viewing in the context of other types of potential media influences on children and young people. It is not meant to be used to create strict rules about when and how content can be broadcast, but rather aims to indicate issues that broadcasters may need to consider in scheduling content and in deciding whether to broadcast information about content. Ofcom conducted two pieces of audience research, one qualitative and one quantitative, during the summer of 2004.

Both research projects focused on the following key questions:
  • Which media are of most concern in terms of their influence on children?
  • Is pre-watershed television programming a particular concern?
  • Are soap operas of particular concern and if so why?
  • Which age-group is seen as most vulnerable?
  • Who ought to be responsible for what children see?
Topics include -

Part 1: Qualitative research
  • Introduction
  • Detailed summary
  • The context of a safe environment
  • The influence of soap operas
  • Attitudes to regulation
Part 2: Quantitative research
  • Introduction
  • Which media are of most concern?
  • Which age of children are felt to be at risk?
  • Levels of concern about pre-watershed content
  • Types of concern about pre-watershed content
  • Opinions about the purpose of soap operas
  • Views on who should be responsible
  • Parental control over children’s viewing
Number of Pages
47
Source